Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum 12:55 CET

Main page Policy/Terms of Use Abbreviations Latest Posts

 Log in |  Register |  Search

90% confidence interval for R_dnm [Study As­sess­ment]

posted by d_labes - Berlin, Germany, 2019-01-07 15:17  - Posting: # 19746
Views: 836

Dear Shuanghe,

» » I would go with the formula of Rdnm
» » [indent]R_dnm = r^(beta1 - 1)

» ...
» This must be it!
» According to his article, Smith use the formula EXP(beta0 + beta1*ln(dose)) to calculate each mean to get ratio Rdnm. so the value is Rdnm = 0.577402 (red digit from my sas). But this is equivalent to what you wrote so if you use the full precision figure we would have obtained the same values (90% CI of (0.477381, 0.698378)). I checked with the AUC data as well, they matches what's reported in table 2.

Could you please give a detailed example for what you did here?

Regards,

Detlew

Complete thread:

Activity
 Mix view
Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum |  Admin contact
19,032 posts in 4,059 threads, 1,299 registered users;
online 14 (1 registered, 13 guests [including 9 identified bots]).

When a distinguished but elderly scientist states that
something is possible, he is almost certainly right.
When he states that something is impossible,
he is very probably wrong.    Arthur C. Clarke

The BIOEQUIVALENCE / BIOAVAILABILITY FORUM is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5 RSS Feed