90% confidence interval for R_dnm [Study As­sess­ment]

posted by d_labes  – Berlin, Germany, 2019-01-07 15:17 (986 d 02:43 ago) – Posting: # 19746
Views: 13,205

Dear Shuanghe,

» » I would go with the formula of Rdnm
» » R_dnm = r^(beta1 - 1)

» ...
» This must be it!
» According to his article, Smith use the formula EXP(beta0 + beta1*ln(dose)) to calculate each mean to get ratio Rdnm. so the value is Rdnm = 0.577402 (red digit from my sas). But this is equivalent to what you wrote so if you use the full precision figure we would have obtained the same values (90% CI of (0.477381, 0.698378)). I checked with the AUC data as well, they matches what's reported in table 2.

Could you please give a detailed example for what you did here?

Regards,

Detlew

Complete thread:

Activity
 Admin contact
21,691 posts in 4,534 threads, 1,541 registered users;
online 8 (0 registered, 8 guests [including 6 identified bots]).
Forum time: Sunday 19:00 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

If you want to get people to believe
something really, really stupid,
just stick a number on it.    Charles Seife

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5