Compilation [Study As­sess­ment]

posted by AngusMcLean – USA, 2016-05-28 02:51 (2880 d 17:58 ago) – Posting: # 16368
Views: 28,824

❝ My preference is REML/Satterthwaite because one could reproduce results in three different software packages. I would avoid NCSS; no idea how the calculation is done.


Jerry from NCSS reports the following:

We have looked into this and resolved it in our own minds. NCSS uses the Kenwood-Rogers method for degrees of freedom which is an extension of the Satterthwaite method.

This NCSS method is:

NCSS REML/extension of Saiterwaite B0 1.9414 (1.4849-2.3978); B1 0.7617 (0.6659-0.8576)
───────────────────────────────────────────────────

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
22,984 posts in 4,822 threads, 1,651 registered users;
55 visitors (0 registered, 55 guests [including 6 identified bots]).
Forum time: 20:49 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

You can’t fix by analysis
what you bungled by design.    Richard J. Light, Judith D. Singer, John B. Willett

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5