NCSS vs. PHX/WNL vs. SAS [Study As­sess­ment]

posted by Helmut Homepage – Vienna, Austria, 2016-05-17 01:50  – Posting: # 16318
Views: 15,199

Hi Angus,

» I have repeated the above calculation in NCSS:
Intercept  1.9414  0.2496   0.000025 1.4849      2.3978      9.2
logDose    0.7617  0.0492   0.000005 0.6659      0.8576      5.9


Phoenix/WinNonlin:
           1.9414  0.2431   0.000020 1.4968      2.3860      9.2
           0.7617  0.0473   0.000004 0.6696      0.8539      5.9


Reported by Smith et al. (SAS Proc Mixed):
           1.94                      1.54        2.35
           0.7615                    0.679       0.844


Results by NCSS and Phoenix/WinNonlin are similar but don’t match SAS (whose CIs are wider). I love software.

Cheers,
Helmut Schütz
[image]

The quality of responses received is directly proportional to the quality of the question asked. ☼
Science Quotes

Complete thread:

Activity
 Mix view
Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum |  Admin contact
19,437 posts in 4,125 threads, 1,325 registered users;
online 6 (1 registered, 5 guests [including 6 identified bots]).
Forum time (Europe/Vienna): 02:00 CEST

On two occasions I have been asked,—“Pray, Mr. Babbage,
if you put into the machine wrong figures,…
will the right answers come out?”

I am not able rightly to apprehend the kind of confusion of ideas
that could provoke such a question.    Charles Babbage

The BIOEQUIVALENCE / BIOAVAILABILITY FORUM is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5