Diagnostics [Study As­sess­ment]

posted by ElMaestro  – Denmark, 2016-05-18 09:20  – Posting: # 16322
Views: 15,436

(edited by ElMaestro on 2016-05-18 09:58)

Hi all,

» » Results by NCSS and Phoenix/WinNonlin are similar but don’t match SAS (whose CIs are wider). I love software.
»
» I'm surprised with the results
» Is it possible to make a dataset for validation? Do we have anywhere the reference dataset and the accurate result?

Extract some model diagnostics: DF's and LogLikelihood, and compare to find out which result is the better candidate.

Life is good.

if (3) 4

x=c("Foo", "Bar")
b=data.frame(x)
typeof(b[,1]) ##aha, integer?
b[,1]+1 ##then let me add 1


Best regards,
ElMaestro

“(...) targeted cancer therapies will benefit fewer than 2 percent of the cancer patients they’re aimed at. That reality is often lost on consumers, who are being fed a steady diet of winning anecdotes about miracle cures.” New York Times (ed.), June 9, 2018.

Complete thread:

Activity
 Mix view
Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum |  Admin contact
19,486 posts in 4,135 threads, 1,334 registered users;
online 16 (0 registered, 16 guests [including 7 identified bots]).
Forum time (Europe/Vienna): 23:05 CEST

If you don’t know anything about computers,
just remember that they are machines that do exactly what you tell them
but often surprise you in the result.    Richard Dawkins

The BIOEQUIVALENCE / BIOAVAILABILITY FORUM is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5