Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum 12:57 CET

Main page Policy/Terms of Use Abbreviations Latest Posts

 Log in |  Register |  Search

Diagnostics [Study As­sess­ment]

posted by ElMaestro - Denmark, 2016-05-18 09:20  - Posting: # 16322
Views: 12,806

(edited by ElMaestro on 2016-05-18 09:58)

Hi all,

» » Results by NCSS and Phoenix/WinNonlin are similar but don’t match SAS (whose CIs are wider). I love software.
»
» I'm surprised with the results
» Is it possible to make a dataset for validation? Do we have anywhere the reference dataset and the accurate result?

Extract some model diagnostics: DF's and LogLikelihood, and compare to find out which result is the better candidate.

Life is good.

if (3) 4

x=c("Foo", "Bar")
b=data.frame(x)
typeof(b[,1]) ##aha, integer?
b[,1]+1 ##then let me add 1



Best regards,
ElMaestro

"(...) targeted cancer therapies will benefit fewer than 2 percent of the cancer patients they’re aimed at. That reality is often lost on consumers, who are being fed a steady diet of winning anecdotes about miracle cures." New York Times (ed.), June 9, 2018.

Complete thread:

Activity
 Mix view
Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum |  Admin contact
19,032 posts in 4,059 threads, 1,299 registered users;
online 21 (1 registered, 20 guests [including 9 identified bots]).

When a distinguished but elderly scientist states that
something is possible, he is almost certainly right.
When he states that something is impossible,
he is very probably wrong.    Arthur C. Clarke

The BIOEQUIVALENCE / BIOAVAILABILITY FORUM is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5 RSS Feed