Setup in Phoenix/WinNonlin [Study As­sess­ment]

posted by AngusMcLean – USA, 2016-05-16 23:00 (3041 d 09:10 ago) – Posting: # 16317
Views: 31,784

❝ With Smith’s Cmax-data of Table 1 I got for the slope:

❝ 0.7617 (90% CI: 0.6696, 0.8539), slightly different from the reported 0.7615 (0.679, 0.844).


I have repeated the above calculation in NCSS as desribed by Jerry: here are the results of Brian Smith's example.
                                     90.0%       90.0%
          Effect   Effect            Lower       Upper
Effect    Estimate Standard Prob     Conf. Limit Conf. Limit     Effect
Name      (Beta)   Error    Level    of Beta     of Beta     DF  No.
Intercept  1.9414  0.2496   0.000025 1.4849      2.3978      9.2 1
logDose    0.7617  0.0492   0.000005 0.6659      0.8576      5.9 2

The within subject variance was 0.0146 (the same as Phoenix).

Edit: Full quote removed, tabulators changed to spaces and BBcoded. Please delete everything from the text of the original poster which is not necessary in understanding your answer; see also this post #5 and #6! [Helmut]

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,223 posts in 4,877 threads, 1,654 registered users;
29 visitors (1 registered, 28 guests [including 6 identified bots]).
Forum time: 08:11 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

One of the symptoms of an approaching nervous breakdown
is the belief that one’s work is terribly important.    Bertrand Russell

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5