Compilation [Study As­sess­ment]

posted by AngusMcLean – USA, 2016-05-28 00:51  – Posting: # 16368
Views: 13,304

» My preference is REML/Satterthwaite because one could reproduce results in three different software packages. I would avoid NCSS; no idea how the calculation is done.

Jerry from NCSS reports the following:

We have looked into this and resolved it in our own minds. NCSS uses the Kenwood-Rogers method for degrees of freedom which is an extension of the Satterthwaite method.

This NCSS method is:

NCSS REML/extension of Saiterwaite B0 1.9414 (1.4849-2.3978); B1 0.7617 (0.6659-0.8576)
───────────────────────────────────────────────────

Complete thread:

Activity
 Mix view
Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum |  Admin contact
19,268 posts in 4,098 threads, 1,314 registered users;
online 14 (0 registered, 14 guests [including 9 identified bots]).

That which is not controversial
is of no particular interest.    Johann Wolfgang von Goethe

The BIOEQUIVALENCE / BIOAVAILABILITY FORUM is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5