Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum 12:25 CET

Main page Policy/Terms of Use Abbreviations Latest Posts

 Log in |  Register |  Search

 
 Mix view

Compilation [Study As­sess­ment]

posted by AngusMcLean - USA, 2016-05-28 00:51  - Posting: # 16368
Views: 11,818

» My preference is REML/Satterthwaite because one could reproduce results in three different software packages. I would avoid NCSS; no idea how the calculation is done.
Jerry from NCSS reports the following:

We have looked into this and resolved it in our own minds. NCSS uses the Kenwood-Rogers method for degrees of freedom which is an extension of the Satterthwaite method.

This NCSS method is:

NCSS REML/extension of Saiterwaite B0 1.9414 (1.4849-2.3978); B1 0.7617 (0.6659-0.8576)
───────────────────────────────────────────────────

Complete thread:

Activity
 Mix view
Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum |  Admin contact
19,032 posts in 4,059 threads, 1,299 registered users;
online 16 (1 registered, 15 guests [including 10 identified bots]).

When a distinguished but elderly scientist states that
something is possible, he is almost certainly right.
When he states that something is impossible,
he is very probably wrong.    Arthur C. Clarke

The BIOEQUIVALENCE / BIOAVAILABILITY FORUM is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5 RSS Feed