complete or not [Study As­sess­ment]

posted by Helmut Homepage – Vienna, Austria, 2016-05-24 18:57 (2941 d 13:36 ago) – Posting: # 16361
Views: 29,887

Dear Detlew,

❝ ❝ My preference is REML/Satterthwaite because one could reproduce results in three different software packages.

Emphasis by me.

❝ That's not really a reason.

I stand corrected. ;-)

❝ The first sentences seem to point to an advantage of REML over ML estimation, left the question of the ddfm aside.

Yep. In dose proportionality quite often (much) more levels than in BE come into play. The highest I have seen so far were five. Unbalanced & incomplete data are more the rule than an exception. That’s why I would prefer REML.

Dif-tor heh smusma 🖖🏼 Довге життя Україна! [image]
Helmut Schütz

The quality of responses received is directly proportional to the quality of the question asked. 🚮
Science Quotes

Complete thread:

UA Flag
 Admin contact
23,056 posts in 4,840 threads, 1,641 registered users;
95 visitors (0 registered, 95 guests [including 6 identified bots]).
Forum time: 08:34 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

Everything is trivial, if you know the answer.    Thomas Jaki

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz