complete or not [Study As­sess­ment]

posted by Helmut Homepage – Vienna, Austria, 2016-05-24 16:57 (1979 d 15:33 ago) – Posting: # 16361
Views: 24,796

Dear Detlew,

» » My preference is REML/Satterthwaite because one could reproduce results in three different software packages.
» Emphasis by me.
» That's not really a reason.

I stand corrected. ;-)

» The first sentences seem to point to an advantage of REML over ML estimation, left the question of the ddfm aside.

Yep. In dose proportionality quite often (much) more levels than in BE come into play. The highest I have seen so far were five. Unbalanced & incomplete data are more the rule than an exception. That’s why I would prefer REML.

Dif-tor heh smusma 🖖
Helmut Schütz

The quality of responses received is directly proportional to the quality of the question asked. 🚮
Science Quotes

Complete thread:

 Admin contact
21,756 posts in 4,548 threads, 1,544 registered users;
online 17 (0 registered, 17 guests [including 5 identified bots]).
Forum time: Monday 08:31 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

The plural of anecdote is data.    Raymond Wolfinger

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz