complete or not [Study As­sess­ment]

posted by Helmut Homepage – Vienna, Austria, 2016-05-24 16:57  – Posting: # 16361
Views: 17,341

Dear Detlew,

» » My preference is REML/Satterthwaite because one could reproduce results in three different software packages.
» Emphasis by me.
»
» That's not really a reason.

I stand corrected. ;-)

» The first sentences seem to point to an advantage of REML over ML estimation, left the question of the ddfm aside.

Yep. In dose proportionality quite often (much) more levels than in BE come into play. The highest I have seen so far were five. Unbalanced & incomplete data are more the rule than an exception. That’s why I would prefer REML.

Cheers,
Helmut Schütz
[image]

The quality of responses received is directly proportional to the quality of the question asked. ☼
Science Quotes

Complete thread:

Activity
 Mix view
Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum |  Admin contact
19,889 posts in 4,215 threads, 1,364 registered users;
online 7 (0 registered, 7 guests [including 5 identified bots]).
Forum time (Europe/Vienna): 07:47 CEST

I have no opinion about ‘incurred samples’ –
an expression which has no easily understandable
meaning for me in the English language.    Nick Holford

The BIOEQUIVALENCE / BIOAVAILABILITY FORUM is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5