complete or not [Study As­sess­ment]

posted by Helmut Homepage – Vienna, Austria, 2016-05-24 16:57  – Posting: # 16361
Views: 15,396

Dear Detlew,

» » My preference is REML/Satterthwaite because one could reproduce results in three different software packages.
» Emphasis by me.
»
» That's not really a reason.

I stand corrected. ;-)

» The first sentences seem to point to an advantage of REML over ML estimation, left the question of the ddfm aside.

Yep. In dose proportionality quite often (much) more levels than in BE come into play. The highest I have seen so far were five. Unbalanced & incomplete data are more the rule than an exception. That’s why I would prefer REML.

Cheers,
Helmut Schütz
[image]

The quality of responses received is directly proportional to the quality of the question asked. ☼
Science Quotes

Complete thread:

Activity
 Mix view
Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum |  Admin contact
19,545 posts in 4,145 threads, 1,340 registered users;
online 14 (0 registered, 14 guests [including 9 identified bots]).
Forum time (Europe/Vienna): 10:27 CEST

Anyone who has never made a mistake
has never tried anything new.    Albert Einstein

The BIOEQUIVALENCE / BIOAVAILABILITY FORUM is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5