0.95 or 1.05 [Power / Sample Size]

posted by Helmut Homepage – Vienna, Austria, 2018-10-10 13:41 (1023 d 13:00 ago) – Posting: # 19428
Views: 22,353

Hi Oleg,

» […] can you explain your message to my colleagues in russian here

Interesting thread (as far as Google-translate took me). IIRC, some posters were not sure whether to use an assumed T/R-ratio of 0.95 or 1.05. Have a look at this post and that one. In short, if you assume a 5% difference but are not (very!) sure about the direction of the deviation (lower or higher than 100%), a study powered for 0.95 will always be sufficiently powered for 1.05 as well but not the other way ’round.

Dif-tor heh smusma 🖖
Helmut Schütz
[image]

The quality of responses received is directly proportional to the quality of the question asked. 🚮
Science Quotes

Complete thread:

Activity
 Admin contact
21,592 posts in 4,514 threads, 1,532 registered users;
online 2 (0 registered, 2 guests [including 2 identified bots]).
Forum time: Friday 02:41 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

It is a capital mistake to theorise before one has data.    Arthur Conan Doyle

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5