“Forced BE” 101 [Power / Sample Size]

posted by kms.srinivas – India, 2017-12-27 13:41 (1920 d 16:48 ago) – Posting: # 18098
Views: 32,434

Dear Helmut,
Much pleasure with your reply.

❝ study planned for 90% power: The chance to obtain a post hoc power of ≥95% is ~35%.


Is it a thumb rule? how it should be calculated?

❝ It only means that

❝    – the CV was lower and/or

❝    – the GMR closer to 1 and/or

❝    – you had less dropouts than assumed.


Yes, on getting posthoc analysis, i found three aspects what you said:
After experiment, it came to know that
1. CV getting lower
2. GMR close to 1
3. No dropouts/withdrawls (though prior consideration of 10% dropouts)

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
22,559 posts in 4,725 threads, 1,607 registered users;
18 visitors (0 registered, 18 guests [including 9 identified bots]).
Forum time: 07:30 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

The penalty for scientific irrelevance is, of course,
that the statistician’s work is ignored by the scientific community.    George E.P. Box

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5