Assumptions… [Power / Sample Size]

posted by Helmut Homepage – Vienna, Austria, 2019-09-09 14:09 (771 d 10:22 ago) – Posting: # 20558
Views: 4,457

Hi Rocco,

see what I wrote above.
Since you have no idea about the new formulation you have to assume indeed that the variances of T and R are at least similar. If you don’t like this assumption, there are just two ways out:
  1. Pilot study or
  2. Adaptive Two-Stage Sequential design.
Even if you are wary and walk this road, you have to assume things. The CV and the T/R-ratio are estimates and therefore, uncertain. Relying on assumptions is part of the game. Only death is certain.

Dif-tor heh smusma 🖖
Helmut Schütz
[image]

The quality of responses received is directly proportional to the quality of the question asked. 🚮
Science Quotes

Complete thread:

Activity
 Admin contact
21,743 posts in 4,546 threads, 1,543 registered users;
online 3 (0 registered, 3 guests [including 2 identified bots]).
Forum time: Wednesday 00:32 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

Mediocrity finds safety in standardization.    Frederick E. Crane

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5