Full ACK [Power / Sample Size]

posted by d_labes  – Berlin, Germany, 2017-12-28 17:41 (1310 d 03:47 ago) – Posting: # 18116
Views: 30,270

Dear David,

» In this case, given your simulations above and the expected probability of approximately 12% of the studies having power greater then 95% having in consideration the initial assumptions, post hoc power means nothing.

Full ACK.
But not only in this case, also in other cases. The concept of post-hoc power is flawed by its own.

» But if you had 100 studies instead and 90% of the had >95% power although the sample size was calculated assuming expected power of 80%, some questions and conclusions might be drawn from those results, don't you think? From my understanding of the initial question, this was the case found. So I think that they should start by reviewing how they define their assumptions for the sample size, namely why they assume GMR=1.10 instead of the "normal" 0.95/1.05.

Again: Full ACK.

Regards,

Detlew

Complete thread:

Activity
 Admin contact
21,594 posts in 4,515 threads, 1,532 registered users;
online 21 (0 registered, 21 guests [including 4 identified bots]).
Forum time: Friday 22:28 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

It is a capital mistake to theorise before one has data.    Arthur Conan Doyle

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5