No analytic solution! [Power / Sample Size]

posted by Helmut Homepage – Vienna, Austria, 2013-02-07 13:32 (4523 d 15:49 ago) – Posting: # 9985
Views: 10,914

Hi Anu,

❝ I have used the R-code as well that you have provided. In my data (CV=40%, Ratio=1.16), through R-code sample size came 39 and with ref to the Table A3, Sample-size is between (47-104).


As Detlew already pointed out there is no analytical solution for RSABE due to the GMR-restriction (+ the 50% CV cap for EMA). Either you use the tables or you set up your own simulations.

require(PowerTOST)
sigma0  <- 0.25 # FDA's
CVwr    <- 0.4
sigmawr <- CV2se(CVwr)
L       <- exp(-log(1.25)/sigma0*sigmawr)
U       <- exp(+log(1.25)/sigma0*sigmawr)
if(CVwr <= 0.3){L <- 0.8; U <-1.25} # no scaling
for(theta0 in seq(1.15, 1.20, by=0.05)){
  sampleN.TOST(CV=CVwr, theta0=theta0, theta1=L, theta2=U, design="2x3x3")
}

+++++++++++ Equivalence test - TOST +++++++++++
            Sample size estimation
-----------------------------------------------
Study design:  partial replicate (2x3x3)
log-transformed data (multiplicative model)

alpha = 0.05, target power = 0.8
BE margins        = 0.7090232 ... 1.410391
Null (true) ratio = 1.15,  CV = 0.4

Sample size (total)
 n     power
36   0.822516

+++++++++++ Equivalence test - TOST +++++++++++
            Sample size estimation
-----------------------------------------------
Study design:  partial replicate (2x3x3)
log-transformed data (multiplicative model)

alpha = 0.05, target power = 0.8
BE margins        = 0.7090232 ... 1.410391
Null (true) ratio = 1.2,  CV = 0.4

Sample size (total)
 n     power
54   0.803675


Table A3 (FDA method, 3-period, 80% power) for CV 40% gives 47 (GMR 1.15) and 104 (GMR 1.20) subjects. Sample sizes are substantially larger (especially for GMR 1.20) due to the [0.80–1.25] restriction.

Good news: For GMR 1.16 your 39 would be correct …
Bad news:  … but only by ignoring the restriction.

Dif-tor heh smusma 🖖🏼 Довге життя Україна! [image]
Helmut Schütz
[image]

The quality of responses received is directly proportional to the quality of the question asked. 🚮
Science Quotes

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,424 posts in 4,927 threads, 1,686 registered users;
34 visitors (0 registered, 34 guests [including 10 identified bots]).
Forum time: 06:22 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

Complex, statistically improbable things are by their nature
more difficult to explain than
simple, statistically probable things.    Richard Dawkins

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5