Phoenix/WinNonlin: get 6.3! [RSABE / ABEL]
Dear Karthik,
John is right. I strongly suggest to upgrade to version 6.3 for free. The setup is much, much easier and 6.2.1 contains a bug if you use ABE instead of LME; see my white papers. Above there are workflows for EMA’s models for PHX 6.2.1 and 6.3. Just compare the setups.
❝ Whether we will get 95% upper confidence bound for reference-scaled average bioequivalence in WinNonlin software version 6.2.1?
John is right. I strongly suggest to upgrade to version 6.3 for free. The setup is much, much easier and 6.2.1 contains a bug if you use ABE instead of LME; see my white papers. Above there are workflows for EMA’s models for PHX 6.2.1 and 6.3. Just compare the setups.
—
Dif-tor heh smusma 🖖🏼 Довге життя Україна!![[image]](https://static.bebac.at/pics/Blue_and_yellow_ribbon_UA.png)
Helmut Schütz
![[image]](https://static.bebac.at/img/CC by.png)
The quality of responses received is directly proportional to the quality of the question asked. 🚮
Science Quotes
Dif-tor heh smusma 🖖🏼 Довге життя Україна!
![[image]](https://static.bebac.at/pics/Blue_and_yellow_ribbon_UA.png)
Helmut Schütz
![[image]](https://static.bebac.at/img/CC by.png)
The quality of responses received is directly proportional to the quality of the question asked. 🚮
Science Quotes
Complete thread:
- Phoenix/WinNonlin 6.2.1: 95% upper bound limit K2K 2013-01-15 13:18 [RSABE / ABEL]
- Phoenix/WinNonlin 6.2.1: 95% upper bound limit jag009 2013-01-15 15:16
- Phoenix/WinNonlin: get 6.3!Helmut 2013-01-15 15:51
- Phoenix/WinNonlin: get 6.3! K2K 2013-01-16 04:35
