Ach du lieber [Two-Stage / GS Designs]

posted by ElMaestro  – Denmark, 2012-10-23 22:51 (4992 d 03:53 ago) – Posting: # 9455
Views: 8,493

Hi Helmut,


❝ Not quite. You are mixing two things up, IMHO. T/R is an assumption – not “known”.


Not quite. You are mixing two things up, IMHO :-D
When we do simulations, we know the exact T/R we are simulating. This is the situation I am talking about here. My question is not related to the situation of an applicant conducting a two-stage trial when T/R is estimated and never known.
My thought was prolly a bad idea anyway. A shift in T or R (location?!) will affect the minimised SS, albeit if we tamper with it that way I no longer know if the resulting s derived from minimisation of SS will be unbiased. In principle the latter issue is of less importance for me if it turns out the type I error or power is improved.

Pass or fail!
ElMaestro

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,655 posts in 4,993 threads, 1,570 registered users;
134 visitors (0 registered, 134 guests [including 24 identified bots]).
Forum time: 02:44 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

The great tragedy of Science – the slaying
of a beautiful hypothesis by an ugly fact.    Thomas Henry Huxley

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5