Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum • Just forget ANOVA. What next?

Just forget ANOVA. What next? [RSABE / ABEL]

posted by d_labes – Berlin, Germany, 2012-10-15 10:35 (4631 d 22:26 ago) – Posting: # 9415
Views: 10,983

Dear Öberster größter Meister,

Thanks for all your in depth explanations about muddle matrices and similar complicated issues. I will take it to heart and keep there.
First you told me: Forget type III. Now you tell me: Forget ANOVA. What next to forget?
I personally have not and will not trust in any model parameters (aka effect estimates) from a model which doesn't fit. And not getting one ore more coefficients of the model (getting '.' in SAS or 'NA' in R-speak) is for me an indication of no fit. A strong indication.

—
Regards,

Detlew

Complete thread:

Ref. vs. Ref. in partial replicate design d_labes 2012-04-25 15:52 [RSABE / ABEL]
- Ref. vs. Ref. in partial replicate design again d_labes 2012-10-10 10:56
- Ref. vs. Ref. in partial replicate design ElMaestro 2012-10-10 12:39
  - Ref. vs. Ref. in partial replicate design d_labes 2012-10-10 16:26
    - Ref. vs. Ref. in partial replicate design ElMaestro 2012-10-10 17:16
      - R vs. R in partial replicate design d_labes 2012-10-11 09:43
        
        R1 vs R2 ElMaestro 2012-10-11 10:26
        
        R1 vs R2 d_labes 2012-10-11 12:01
        
        R1 vs R2 ElMaestro 2012-10-11 12:09
        
        R1 vs R2 d_labes 2012-10-11 12:46
        
        treatment df ElMaestro 2012-10-11 13:38
        
        Missunderstanding d_labes 2012-10-11 16:34
        
        Missunderstanding, crippled ElMaestro 2012-10-11 18:12
        
        EMA crippled method - R peculiarities d_labes 2012-10-12 14:54
        
        All is good, just forget ANOVA - you don't need it! ElMaestro 2012-10-12 16:25
        
        Just forget ANOVA. What next?d_labes 2012-10-15 08:35
        
        Just forget ANOVA. What next? ElMaestro 2012-10-15 10:04

Admin contact
23,424 posts in 4,927 threads, 1,674 registered users;
103 visitors (0 registered, 103 guests [including 45 identified bots]).
Forum time: 09:01 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

Medical researches can be divided into two sorts:
those who think that meta is better and those
who believe that pooling is fooling. Stephen Senn

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC

Ing. Helmut Schütz