Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum • Just forget ANOVA. What next?

Just forget ANOVA. What next? [RSABE / ABEL]

posted by d_labes – Berlin, Germany, 2012-10-15 10:35 (4997 d 15:11 ago) – Posting: # 9415
Views: 13,470

Dear Öberster größter Meister,

Thanks for all your in depth explanations about muddle matrices and similar complicated issues. I will take it to heart and keep there.
First you told me: Forget type III. Now you tell me: Forget ANOVA. What next to forget?
I personally have not and will not trust in any model parameters (aka effect estimates) from a model which doesn't fit. And not getting one ore more coefficients of the model (getting '.' in SAS or 'NA' in R-speak) is for me an indication of no fit. A strong indication.

—
Regards,

Detlew

Complete thread:

Ref. vs. Ref. in partial replicate design d_labes 2012-04-25 15:52 [RSABE / ABEL]
- Ref. vs. Ref. in partial replicate design again d_labes 2012-10-10 10:56
- Ref. vs. Ref. in partial replicate design ElMaestro 2012-10-10 12:39
  - Ref. vs. Ref. in partial replicate design d_labes 2012-10-10 16:26
    - Ref. vs. Ref. in partial replicate design ElMaestro 2012-10-10 17:16
      - R vs. R in partial replicate design d_labes 2012-10-11 09:43
        
        R1 vs R2 ElMaestro 2012-10-11 10:26
        
        R1 vs R2 d_labes 2012-10-11 12:01
        
        R1 vs R2 ElMaestro 2012-10-11 12:09
        
        R1 vs R2 d_labes 2012-10-11 12:46
        
        treatment df ElMaestro 2012-10-11 13:38
        
        Missunderstanding d_labes 2012-10-11 16:34
        
        Missunderstanding, crippled ElMaestro 2012-10-11 18:12
        
        EMA crippled method - R peculiarities d_labes 2012-10-12 14:54
        
        All is good, just forget ANOVA - you don't need it! ElMaestro 2012-10-12 16:25
        
        Just forget ANOVA. What next?d_labes 2012-10-15 08:35
        
        Just forget ANOVA. What next? ElMaestro 2012-10-15 10:04

Admin contact
23,655 posts in 4,993 threads, 1,571 registered users;
131 visitors (0 registered, 131 guests [including 18 identified bots]).
Forum time: 01:47 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

Science is simply common sense at its best that is,
rigidly accurate in observation, and
merciless to fallacy in logic. Thomas Henry Huxley

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC

Ing. Helmut Schütz