Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum • treatment df

treatment df [RSABE / ABEL]

posted by ElMaestro – Denmark, 2012-10-11 15:38 (4636 d 12:46 ago) – Posting: # 9391
Views: 11,191

Thank you, d_labes,

❝ you have Mehl in der Mehlkiste.


M = lm(A$logDATA ~ 0 + as.factor(A$tmt2) + as.factor(A$subject) + as.factor(A$period) + as.factor(A$sequence))

anova(M)

Analysis of Variance Table



Response: A$logDATA

                      Df  Sum Sq Mean Sq    F value Pr(>F)    

as.factor(A$tmt2)      4 17913.4  4478.3 28057.2233 <2e-16 ***

as.factor(A$subject)  76   214.4     2.8    17.6736 <2e-16 ***

as.factor(A$period)    3     0.3     0.1     0.6654 0.5742    

Residuals            215    34.3     0.2                      

---

Signif. codes:  0 ‘***’ 0.001 ‘**’ 0.01 ‘*’ 0.05 ‘.’ 0.1 ‘ ’ 1

coef(M) gives the effects for all recoded treatments. Note df=4 because the fit is without intercept.

—
Pass or fail!
ElMaestro

Complete thread:

Ref. vs. Ref. in partial replicate design d_labes 2012-04-25 15:52 [RSABE / ABEL]
- Ref. vs. Ref. in partial replicate design again d_labes 2012-10-10 10:56
- Ref. vs. Ref. in partial replicate design ElMaestro 2012-10-10 12:39
  - Ref. vs. Ref. in partial replicate design d_labes 2012-10-10 16:26
    - Ref. vs. Ref. in partial replicate design ElMaestro 2012-10-10 17:16
      - R vs. R in partial replicate design d_labes 2012-10-11 09:43
        
        R1 vs R2 ElMaestro 2012-10-11 10:26
        
        R1 vs R2 d_labes 2012-10-11 12:01
        
        R1 vs R2 ElMaestro 2012-10-11 12:09
        
        R1 vs R2 d_labes 2012-10-11 12:46
        
        treatment dfElMaestro 2012-10-11 13:38
        
        Missunderstanding d_labes 2012-10-11 16:34
        
        Missunderstanding, crippled ElMaestro 2012-10-11 18:12
        
        EMA crippled method - R peculiarities d_labes 2012-10-12 14:54
        
        All is good, just forget ANOVA - you don't need it! ElMaestro 2012-10-12 16:25
        
        Just forget ANOVA. What next? d_labes 2012-10-15 08:35
        
        Just forget ANOVA. What next? ElMaestro 2012-10-15 10:04