C/D for EMA? Good luck! [Two-Stage / GS Designs]
Hi GSD!
Yes – 1/√N hits.*
Are you aware that the acceptability of C/D for EMA is limited (pun intended)? If you want to deal with ABEL, I reckon only Method B might be acceptable – though some member states even mistrust the validity of the power evaluation in the intermediate analysis at all. Right now C/D is only acceptable (without major discussions) in the US and Canada. Since HPFB does not allow scaling this leaves the FDA with an easier model (without the 50% cap – but the discontinuity at 30%).
Sounds like chicken-and-egg to me.
The ratio and CV in the sims are independent – but the scaled acceptance range depends on the actual CV in every simulated study…
❝ […] I realized that 10^6 is a must when you go for Potvin’s 2-stage.
Yes – 1/√N hits.*
❝ ❝ Which one of Potvin’s methods are you aiming at?
❝
❝ Methods C/D.
Are you aware that the acceptability of C/D for EMA is limited (pun intended)? If you want to deal with ABEL, I reckon only Method B might be acceptable – though some member states even mistrust the validity of the power evaluation in the intermediate analysis at all. Right now C/D is only acceptable (without major discussions) in the US and Canada. Since HPFB does not allow scaling this leaves the FDA with an easier model (without the 50% cap – but the discontinuity at 30%).
❝ But if any of your sample CVs exceeds 30%, the acceptance limits are widened. They are no longer fixed at 0.8 and 1.25. When you enter your simulation with a starting CV of say 35%, most of your random samples will have an acceptance limit in the neighborhood of [0.7723, 1.2948]. In this case, when you still center it on ln(0.8), the simulated “type I error” will be huge.
Sounds like chicken-and-egg to me.

- Takes a while to obtain a stable estimate (the red line on top is the critical limit of α>0.05):
—
Dif-tor heh smusma 🖖🏼 Довге життя Україна!![[image]](https://static.bebac.at/pics/Blue_and_yellow_ribbon_UA.png)
Helmut Schütz
![[image]](https://static.bebac.at/img/CC by.png)
The quality of responses received is directly proportional to the quality of the question asked. 🚮
Science Quotes
Dif-tor heh smusma 🖖🏼 Довге життя Україна!
![[image]](https://static.bebac.at/pics/Blue_and_yellow_ribbon_UA.png)
Helmut Schütz
![[image]](https://static.bebac.at/img/CC by.png)
The quality of responses received is directly proportional to the quality of the question asked. 🚮
Science Quotes
Complete thread:
- Potvin’s 2-stage adaptive design GSD 2012-08-17 20:56 [Two-Stage / GS Designs]
- Potvin’s 2-stage adaptive design + RSABE/ABEL Helmut 2012-08-18 00:39
- Potvin’s 2-stage adaptive design + RSABE/ABEL GSD 2012-08-31 16:30
- Power for Two stage Design K2K 2013-10-07 14:43
- Power for Two stage Design Helmut 2013-10-07 14:59
- Power for Two stage Design K2K 2013-10-08 14:35
- “Interim power” Helmut 2013-10-08 14:58
- “Interim power” K2K 2013-10-09 12:39
- Validation of PowerTOST Helmut 2013-10-09 14:10
- Phoenix/WinNonlin - power d_labes 2013-10-09 16:11
- Phoenix/WinNonlin - power Helmut 2013-10-09 18:19
- power K2K 2013-10-10 08:36
- Phoenix/WinNonlin - power Helmut 2013-10-09 18:19
- “Interim power” K2K 2013-10-09 12:39
- “Interim power” Helmut 2013-10-08 14:58
- Power for Two stage Design K2K 2013-10-08 14:35
- Power for Two stage Design Helmut 2013-10-07 14:59
- Potvin’s 2-stage adaptive design + RSABE/ABEL Helmut 2012-08-18 00:39