Tough job [Two-Stage / GS Designs]

posted by GSD – Canada, 2012-08-31 21:23 (5041 d 07:47 ago) – Posting: # 9136
Views: 24,770

Hi Helmut!

Thanks for the graph!

❝ Yes, but as I said at the end of my post not only the grid is too coarse, but IMHO 104 sim’s are not enough.


I actually tried both the 10^4 and 10^5 # of simulations (for about 5 different scenarios), the results are almost identical. I realized that 10^6 is a must when you go for Potvin’s 2-stage.

❝ Which one of Potvin’s methods are you aiming at?


Methods C/D.

❝ Doesn’t make sense. ln(0.8)/ln(1.25) are fixed margins and we are testing for no inflation there. 0.748 is outside the margin and the GMR-restriction would reject all studies.


But if any of your sample CVs exceeds 30%, the acceptance limits are widened. They are no longer fixed at 0.8 and 1.25. When you enter your simulation with a starting CV of say 35%, most of your random samples will have an acceptance limit in the neighborhood of [0.7723, 1.2948]. In this case, when you still center it on ln(0.8), the simulated “type I error” will be huge.

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,655 posts in 4,993 threads, 1,570 registered users;
131 visitors (0 registered, 131 guests [including 32 identified bots]).
Forum time: 05:11 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

Science is simply common sense at its best that is,
rigidly accurate in observation, and
merciless to fallacy in logic.    Thomas Henry Huxley

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5