Sample size feasible [RSABE / ABEL]

posted by AB – India, 2012-02-08 12:40 (4881 d 16:38 ago) – Posting: # 8075
Views: 21,719

Dear d_labes & drgunasakaran

Thanks for Quick response.

The data provided is of Cmax from the study.
PE is 100 and the number of subjects completed in the study were 70, the resulting CI was well within 80-125 with ISCV of 47%.
could i suspect something wrong went in analysis?
on the other hand if every thing was correct why do we need widening of CI?

Regards,
AB

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,424 posts in 4,927 threads, 1,672 registered users;
39 visitors (0 registered, 39 guests [including 13 identified bots]).
Forum time: 06:18 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

Medical researches can be divided into two sorts:
those who think that meta is better and those
who believe that pooling is fooling.    Stephen Senn

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5