Sample size feasible [RSABE / ABEL]
Dear AB,
if your point estimator is ok (i.e. in the range 0.95 ... 1.0526) a sample size estimation with your ISCV and a full replicate design (2-sequence-4-period) gives (using R with package PowerTOST)
Thus the chance with a feasible sample size is greater then anticipated by my previous speaker above
.
But the question remains: Why do you resist in using the 80-125% acceptance range also the EMA allows you a widening
. Or is your ISCV from AUC?
if your point estimator is ok (i.e. in the range 0.95 ... 1.0526) a sample size estimation with your ISCV and a full replicate design (2-sequence-4-period) gives (using R with package PowerTOST)
library(PowerTOST)
sampleN.TOST(CV=0.47, design="2x2x4")
+++++++++++ Equivalence test - TOST +++++++++++
Sample size estimation
-----------------------------------------------
Study design: 2x2x4 replicate crossover
log-transformed data (multiplicative model)
alpha = 0.05, target power = 0.8
BE margins = 0.8 ... 1.25
Null (true) ratio = 0.95, CV = 0.47
Sample size (total)
n power
44 0.806110
Thus the chance with a feasible sample size is greater then anticipated by my previous speaker above

But the question remains: Why do you resist in using the 80-125% acceptance range also the EMA allows you a widening

—
Regards,
Detlew
Regards,
Detlew
Complete thread:
- ISCV and CI AB 2012-02-08 08:21 [RSABE / ABEL]
- ISCV and CI drgunasakaran1 2012-02-08 08:44
- Sample size feasibled_labes 2012-02-08 09:47
- Sample size feasible AB 2012-02-08 11:40
- No worries! Helmut 2012-02-08 13:37
- Sample size down! d_labes 2012-02-08 14:18
- World record? Helmut 2012-02-08 14:31
- Wow! d_labes 2012-02-08 16:16
- World record? jag009 2015-09-23 20:43
- Nope Helmut 2015-09-23 21:57
- World record? Helmut 2012-02-08 14:31
- Sample size feasible AB 2012-02-08 11:40