Log in
RegisterPost hoc power [Power / Sample Size]
posted by Helmut 
– Vienna, Austria, 2011-02-07 20:05 (5250 d 04:38 ago) – Posting: # 6574
Views: 10,323
Dear all,
at the recent workshop in Mumbai I struggled (again) to deliver the message that a posteriori power does not make sense.
In the aftermath of this post on Potvin et al.'s paper I found a sentence soothing my soul:
at the recent workshop in Mumbai I struggled (again) to deliver the message that a posteriori power does not make sense.
In the aftermath of this post on Potvin et al.'s paper I found a sentence soothing my soul:
We stop here and conclude BE, irrespective of the fact that we have not yet achieved the desired power of 80% (power = 66.3%).
—
Dif-tor heh smusma 🖖🏼 Довге життя Україна!![[image]](https://static.bebac.at/pics/Blue_and_yellow_ribbon_UA.png)
Helmut Schütz
![[image]](https://static.bebac.at/img/CC by.png)
The quality of responses received is directly proportional to the quality of the question asked. 🚮
Science Quotes
Dif-tor heh smusma 🖖🏼 Довге життя Україна!
Helmut Schütz
The quality of responses received is directly proportional to the quality of the question asked. 🚮
Science Quotes
Complete thread:
- Post hoc powerHelmut 2011-02-07 19:05 [Power / Sample Size]
![[Mix]](https://static.bebac.at/img/mix.png "open in Mix view")
- The battle is not over d_labes 2011-02-08 09:18
- Fight the good fight Helmut 2011-02-08 11:27
- Post hoc power earlybird 2011-02-08 11:20
- Post hoc power Helmut 2011-02-08 12:22
- Post hoc power Dr_Dan 2011-02-08 14:31
- Post hoc power Helmut 2011-02-08 14:34
- Risk nitpicking d_labes 2011-02-08 15:17
- Post hoc power Helmut 2011-02-08 14:34
- Post hoc power Dr_Dan 2011-02-08 14:31
- Post hoc power Helmut 2011-02-08 12:22
- The battle is not over d_labes 2011-02-08 09:18
Ing. Helmut Schütz