Another one ... [Two-Stage / GS Designs]

posted by d_labes  – Berlin, Germany, 2011-02-07 15:32 (5194 d 01:49 ago) – Posting: # 6567
Views: 26,071

Dear All,

Potvin et. al. describe the use of GMR = 0.95 in the sample size adaption step of their Methods B/C. If we assume a more extreme null ratio and want to calculate the empirical power at that GMR (via simulation):
Is it reasonable / mandatory to use that GMR in the sample size adaption step? :ponder:

Regards,

Detlew

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,424 posts in 4,927 threads, 1,673 registered users;
78 visitors (0 registered, 78 guests [including 5 identified bots]).
Forum time: 18:21 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

There are two possible outcomes: if the result confirms the
hypothesis, then you’ve made a measurement. If the result is
contrary to the hypothesis, then you’ve made a discovery.    Enrico Fermi

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5