Farside CV relabelling [RSABE / ABEL]

posted by AngusMcLean – USA, 2010-11-09 18:12 (5344 d 20:04 ago) – Posting: # 6123
Views: 14,114

The reason for the confusion is we do not know the calculation that is being made by Pharsight. Consequently we do not know conceptually it is incorrect or if there is an error in it.

I had difficulty getting the same number you got so I must not be interpreting your equation correctly.
  exp(+log(1.25)*sigmaRef/0.25)

For sigma = 0.30 I get 1.3221 for above calculation (when exp(+log(1.25) is used. Am I misunderstanding the parenthesis used? First I evaluated e^log1.25= 1.101761


That is (1.101761)*0.3/0.25 =1.3221

Please can you advise as to my error,

Angus


Edit: Full quote removed. Please delete anything from the text of the original poster which is not necessary in understanding your answer; see also this post! [Helmut]

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,424 posts in 4,927 threads, 1,687 registered users;
63 visitors (0 registered, 63 guests [including 11 identified bots]).
Forum time: 15:16 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

Complex, statistically improbable things are by their nature
more difficult to explain than
simple, statistically probable things.    Richard Dawkins

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5