Farside CV relabelling [RSABE / ABEL]

posted by Helmut Homepage – Vienna, Austria, 2010-11-09 16:10 (5344 d 22:18 ago) – Posting: # 6121
Views: 14,159

Dear D. Labes!

❝ ❝ Well, I have no idea what Pharsight calculated here …


❝ Me too. Their formula given on the slide

  +1.25(sigmaRef/0.25)

❝ is clearly nonsense. It would give negative lower bounds!


Sure. But note that the upper bound is OK, maybe the have calculated L=1/U?

❝ The correct one is

  exp(+log(1.25)*sigmaRef/0.25)

❝ I think.


Right – as always. :cool:

❝ Taking the numbers for the widened acceptance ranges given, they seems to have a label problem.


Oh no! :crying:

❝ Eventually one should remind the author of the slides that labelling falls under the policy of GMP :-D.


I have linked this thread to Pharsight’s Extranet ten hours ago…

❝ BTW:

<nitpicking> ------------------

❝ I get for the FDA's widened limits: [...]


</nitpicking> ------------------


Me too – even with bloody M$-Excel (excuse me, Martin). Don’t know what László has done here. Was too late to produce a nice looking plot in R

Dif-tor heh smusma 🖖🏼 Довге життя Україна! [image]
Helmut Schütz
[image]

The quality of responses received is directly proportional to the quality of the question asked. 🚮
Science Quotes

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,424 posts in 4,927 threads, 1,687 registered users;
60 visitors (0 registered, 60 guests [including 6 identified bots]).
Forum time: 15:29 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

Complex, statistically improbable things are by their nature
more difficult to explain than
simple, statistically probable things.    Richard Dawkins

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5