Factor 2 is unbiased [RSABE / ABEL]

posted by d_labes  – Berlin, Germany, 2010-04-27 16:30 (5481 d 02:09 ago) – Posting: # 5248
Views: 36,176

Dear sailor and simulant,

❝ But what about this (page 5, emphasis in red by me):

From the dataset DGLM1, calculate the following:

❝ DGLM1: dfd=df;

s2wr=ms/2;


❝ Do you know how/what/why?


Here the analysis covers the differences R1-R2 which has expected variance =2*sigma2WR.
The trick of the GLM call (diffs versus sequence) gives the MS of R1-R2 "stratified" over the sequences (double sum in the formula for s2WR in step 1 on page 2 divided by (n-m)). You can verify this by conventional calculation.

Since I have answered your question I'm exempted from answering the bonus questions :-D.
To be honest: I don't know exactly. But I conjecture: Yes in balanced design without missings.

Regards,

Detlew

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,424 posts in 4,927 threads, 1,668 registered users;
23 visitors (0 registered, 23 guests [including 8 identified bots]).
Forum time: 18:39 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

The whole purpose of education is
to turn mirrors into windows.    Sydney J. Harris

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5