75% confidence... [Power / Sample Size]

posted by Helmut Homepage – Vienna, Austria, 2010-03-19 15:12 (5536 d 04:26 ago) – Posting: # 4939
Views: 12,939

Dear D Labes,

you are are right; this is a typo - 5 % is correct.

❝ BTW: I nevertheless are the opinion that a 95% CI is too stringent.


Yes; I re-read the entire chapter - where did I get the 80 % from?!

❝ But have no reference for it. Patterson and Jones cite Gould in this context.


Gould (p.71) uses the upper 75 % confidence bound (Chi²0.25,df).

Dif-tor heh smusma 🖖🏼 Довге життя Україна! [image]
Helmut Schütz
[image]

The quality of responses received is directly proportional to the quality of the question asked. 🚮
Science Quotes

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,424 posts in 4,927 threads, 1,668 registered users;
85 visitors (0 registered, 85 guests [including 7 identified bots]).
Forum time: 20:39 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

Don’t undertake a project
unless it’s manifestly important
and nearly impossible.    Edwin H. Land

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5