Sample size for a pilot study to estimate the CVintra [Power / Sample Size]

posted by yjlee168 Homepage – Kaohsiung, Taiwan, 2010-03-04 23:35 (5550 d 20:34 ago) – Posting: # 4863
Views: 13,079

Dear Helmut,

Thanks again for your response.

❝ variability. I'm afraid, there is not a simple answer to the question above.


Agree.

❝ ❝ Uhh... Sorry about that I don't know how to interpret/use this table.

❝ That's easy. You have a pilot study (n=4) which gave you a CV of 20%


I see. Great.

❝ I'm not sure whether I understand this procedure. Sounds like some kind of resampling (bootstraping), but I don't get the point. Why 24? Bootstraping


Kind of, but it's absolutely not.

❝ Well, easy question - difficult answer. I'm really in favour of sequential designs; you guessed right: D Potvin et al. (2008) is my favourite method.


Well, thanks to ElMaestro too. After I got the replied message from EM, I did some search and found some nice articles regarding adaptive two-stage desing with pilot-pivotal trials for average BE. I think the optimal design of a average BE pilot study is an important issue, although we do not see many investigators published the results of their pilot study. Probably it's kind of trivial as you said.

All the best,
-- Yung-jin Lee
bear v2.9.2:- created by Hsin-ya Lee & Yung-jin Lee
Kaohsiung, Taiwan https://www.pkpd168.com/bear
Download link (updated) -> here

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,424 posts in 4,927 threads, 1,668 registered users;
150 visitors (0 registered, 150 guests [including 12 identified bots]).
Forum time: 21:10 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

Don’t undertake a project
unless it’s manifestly important
and nearly impossible.    Edwin H. Land

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5