Tlag - subtleties [NCA / SHAM]

posted by d_labes  – Berlin, Germany, 2010-03-03 10:23 (5588 d 20:12 ago) – Posting: # 4850
Views: 11,270

Dear all,

beside the discussion we had already in this thread about some variants of defining Tlag I came across some data which made me wondering.

Here an example:
planTime time   CStr   Conc.
     0.0  0.0  <LLOQ   0.00
     0.5  0.5  12.82  12.82
     1.0  1.0  <LLOQ   0.00
     1.5  1.5  <LLOQ   0.00
     2.0  2.0 120.51 120.51
     2.5  2.5 247.52 247.52
     3.0  3.0  99.21  99.21
     3.5  3.5  76.85  76.85
     4.0  4.0 160.08 160.08
     6.0  6.0  35.26  35.26
... (truncated)

LLOQ was 9.6 ng/mL in that study.

My questions:

Regards,

Detlew

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,424 posts in 4,927 threads, 1,673 registered users;
77 visitors (0 registered, 77 guests [including 48 identified bots]).
Forum time: 07:35 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

Medical researches can be divided into two sorts:
those who think that meta is better and those
who believe that pooling is fooling.    Stephen Senn

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5