Sample size estimation (Bolton/Bon) [Power / Sample Size]

posted by Helmut Homepage – Vienna, Austria, 2007-01-04 12:17 (6699 d 02:13 ago) – Posting: # 432
Views: 8,220

Dear Imran!

❝ Boltan gives a example to calculate sample size (page no. 157) where it estimate sample size using the mean and SD.


Be careful! To quote Bolton/Bon:

“Estimates of the standard deviations of the ratios of the values of each of the parameters […] were determined from a small pilot study.”

If you don’t have the study’s data available, where to you get the SD of the individual ratios from?

I used subjects 1-6 of my example data to get:
SD of T/R-ratios: 0.19923581
applying Eq.(6.6) with a maximum deviation (Delta) to detect of 0.2 one gets N=9.71
which is in agreement with the common method based on CV%-intra, where N=10 is estimated for a point estimate of 0.95 (Delta 0.05).
With a PE of 0.90 N is estimated with 18…

Using subjects 7-12 (6.6) gets N=23.9, again in agreement with the CV%-intra method, which gets N=24.

❝ so calcualtion of a sample size using this formula will be questionalbe!!!!


Hmm, I agree, but since you need to have access to raw data for Bolton/Bon’s formula also, why not using one of the ‘traditional’ sample size estimations based on the intra-subject CV anyway?
It looks like that (6.6) gives the ‘correct’ sample size for a PE of 0.95; but other Deltas should be possible according to the Guidelines…

Dif-tor heh smusma 🖖🏼 Довге життя Україна! [image]
Helmut Schütz
[image]

The quality of responses received is directly proportional to the quality of the question asked. 🚮
Science Quotes

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,424 posts in 4,927 threads, 1,673 registered users;
244 visitors (0 registered, 244 guests [including 4 identified bots]).
Forum time: 15:31 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

Young man, in mathematics you don’t understand things.
You just get used to them.    John von Neumann

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5