Urban legend? [Regulatives / Guidelines]
Dear all!
Really?
Or just an Urban legend of the pharmacokinetolophystic (© ElMaestro) type?
single dose
AUCinf
T 84.02 ng*h/ml
R 93.35 ng*h/ml
T/R 90 %
Cmax
T 5.84 ng/ml
R 6.49 ng/ml
T/R 90 %
steady state
AUCtau
T 83.31 ng*h/ml
R 92.56 ng*h/ml
T/R 90 %
Cmax
T 10.84 ng/ml
R 11.64 ng/ml
T/R 90 %
T/Rsteady state = T/Rsingle dose = 90%, both for AUC and Cmax. Of course Cmax values in steady state are further apart (0.80 ng/ml) than after a single dose (0.65 ng/ml), but the ratio stays the same. Am I missing something?
If somebody is interested in repeating the simulation: I used WinNonlin's
❝ Exactly. From a PK point of view it's possible to show that Cmax is less sensitive to differences then AUC if going from single dose to steady state (this statement is also given in the earlier sentence).
❝ [...] it's possible to show it by simulations. I have the references somewhere, [...]
❝ But you can do it on your own: Fire up some PK software (even M$-Excel would do the job) - define parameters of two hypothetical formulations in such a way that Cmax is let's say 10% apart - go into steady state - the difference should be smaller.
Really?
Or just an Urban legend of the pharmacokinetolophystic (© ElMaestro) type?
![[image]](img/uploaded/image12.png)
AUCinf
T 84.02 ng*h/ml
R 93.35 ng*h/ml
T/R 90 %
Cmax
T 5.84 ng/ml
R 6.49 ng/ml
T/R 90 %
steady state
AUCtau
T 83.31 ng*h/ml
R 92.56 ng*h/ml
T/R 90 %
Cmax
T 10.84 ng/ml
R 11.64 ng/ml
T/R 90 %
T/Rsteady state = T/Rsingle dose = 90%, both for AUC and Cmax. Of course Cmax values in steady state are further apart (0.80 ng/ml) than after a single dose (0.65 ng/ml), but the ratio stays the same. Am I missing something?
If somebody is interested in repeating the simulation: I used WinNonlin's
Exp1.pwo
dataset (like in this post), and changed F from 1 (Reference) to 0.9 (Test). h ng/ml
0.1 2.6
0.25 4.817
0.5 6.596
0.75 6.471
1 6.049
1.5 5.314
2 4.611
2.5 4.5
3 4.392
4 4.013
5 3.698
6 3.505
8 3.382
12 2.844
14 2.383
24 1.287
—
Dif-tor heh smusma 🖖🏼 Довге життя Україна!![[image]](https://static.bebac.at/pics/Blue_and_yellow_ribbon_UA.png)
Helmut Schütz
![[image]](https://static.bebac.at/img/CC by.png)
The quality of responses received is directly proportional to the quality of the question asked. 🚮
Science Quotes
Dif-tor heh smusma 🖖🏼 Довге життя Україна!
![[image]](https://static.bebac.at/pics/Blue_and_yellow_ribbon_UA.png)
Helmut Schütz
![[image]](https://static.bebac.at/img/CC by.png)
The quality of responses received is directly proportional to the quality of the question asked. 🚮
Science Quotes
Complete thread:
- Critical review of EU BE guideline (Rev.1) Helmut 2008-08-22 14:30 [Regulatives / Guidelines]
- Critical review of EU BE guideline (Rev.1) d_labes 2008-08-22 15:42
- Critical review of EU BE guideline (Rev.1) Helmut 2008-08-23 02:02
- Critical review of EU BE guideline (Rev.1) d_labes 2008-08-25 09:14
- Variations Helmut 2008-08-25 11:06
- Critical review of EU BE guideline (Rev.1) d_labes 2008-08-25 09:14
- Critical review of EU BE guideline (Rev.1) Helmut 2008-08-23 02:02
- Critical review of EU BE guideline (Rev.1) Jaime_R 2008-08-23 16:47
- Critical review of EU BE guideline (Rev.1) Ravi 2008-08-25 08:19
- Two Stage Design Helmut 2008-08-25 11:43
- Two Stage Design JPL 2008-08-28 09:44
- Two Stage Design Helmut 2008-08-28 11:50
- Two Stage Design d_labes 2008-08-28 12:09
- Sequential Design Helmut 2008-11-05 13:22
- Two Stage Design Helmut 2008-08-28 11:50
- Two Stage Design JPL 2008-08-28 09:44
- Two Stage Design Helmut 2008-08-25 11:43
- Critical review of EU BE guideline (Rev.1) banusunman 2008-08-26 16:56
- Washout Helmut 2008-10-15 16:02
- Critical review of EU BE guideline (Rev.1) Ravi 2008-08-25 08:19
- Critical review of EU BE guideline (Rev.1) d_labes 2008-08-25 09:49
- Critical review of EU BE guideline (Rev.1) Helmut 2008-08-25 12:11
- Critical review of EU BE guideline (Rev.1) d_labes 2008-08-25 13:03
- Urban legend?Helmut 2008-11-21 16:06
- Urban legend? d_labes 2008-11-24 15:06
- Critical review of EU BE guideline (Rev.1) Helmut 2008-08-25 12:11
- Critical review of EU BE guideline (Rev.1) d_labes 2008-08-25 11:16
- Critical review of EU BE guideline (Rev.1), tmax, MRT, LZ d_labes 2008-08-25 11:32
- Critical review of EU BE guideline (Rev.1), tmax, MRT, LZ Helmut 2008-08-25 13:10
- tmax, nonparametrics Helmut 2008-10-13 15:38
- tmax, nonparametrics d_labes 2008-10-14 08:33
- tmax, nonparametrics Helmut 2008-10-14 11:29
- tmax, Canadian approach Helmut 2008-11-21 15:41
- tmax, Canadian approach d_labes 2008-11-24 13:53
- Early exposure, Canadian approach: GMR only! Helmut 2009-02-08 00:44
- Early exposure, Canadian approach: GMR only! d_labes 2009-02-09 08:50
- Early exposure, Canadian approach: GMR only! Helmut 2009-02-08 00:44
- tmax; another example Helmut 2008-12-25 15:59
- tmax, Canadian approach d_labes 2008-11-24 13:53
- tmax, nonparametrics d_labes 2008-10-14 08:33
- Automatic integration janmacek 2008-08-27 12:21
- Automatic integration Ohlbe 2008-08-27 14:49
- Manual reintegration! H_Rotter 2008-08-28 11:28
- Manual reintegration! ElMaestro 2008-08-28 12:44
- Manual reintegration! H_Rotter 2008-08-28 11:28
- Automatic integration Ohlbe 2008-08-27 14:49
- Subject accountability, Proc MIXED or equivalent d_labes 2008-09-02 11:13
- Subject accountability, Proc MIXED or equivalent Ohlbe 2008-09-02 15:20
- Subject accountability, Proc MIXED or equivalent d_labes 2008-09-02 16:30
- Subject accountability, Proc MIXED or equivalent Ohlbe 2008-09-02 15:20
- partial AUC, early exposure d_labes 2008-09-03 08:35
- HVDs? Helmut 2008-09-23 12:52
- HVDs? d_labes 2008-09-23 14:20
- HVDs? Helmut 2009-01-20 14:33
- E.g., omeprazole Helmut 2009-03-06 17:21
- BCS-based Biowaiver Helmut 2008-09-25 15:48
- Dissolution update Helmut 2008-10-13 12:43
- EUFEPS workshop Helmut 2008-12-23 17:03
- Critical review of EU BE guideline (Rev.1) d_labes 2008-08-22 15:42