extra-reference design: no period effect assumption [RSABE / ABEL]

posted by BEQool  – 2025-12-31 17:42 (167 d 13:13 ago) – Posting: # 24546
Views: 1,626

Hey Mittyri,

❝ Yes - for PE under the standard fixed effects model with period (any systematic shift in period 3, R is absorbed by the period 3 effect)

❝ No - for CI (see residual MS and residual df)

Yes of course CI is affected, I wanted to say only PE - thanks!

Thank you for all your answers and explanations, everything is clear now :ok:

All the best for the new year :party:

BEQool

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,654 posts in 4,992 threads, 1,570 registered users;
156 visitors (0 registered, 156 guests [including 13 identified bots]).
Forum time: 07:56 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

Scientists often have a naïve faith that
if only they could discover enough facts about a problem,
these facts would somehow arrange themselves
in a compelling and true solution.    Theodosius Dobzhansky

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5