FARTSSIE 3.0 [Software]

posted by Helmut Homepage – Vienna, Austria, 2024-06-19 16:55 (325 d 10:54 ago) – Posting: # 24032
Views: 3,199

Dear all,

two days ago Dave published v3.0 on GitHub. Changed: Correct calculation of CVtotal from the 90 or 95% CI of a study in a parallel design (sheet [Bioequivalence, Parallel], CV from published Point Estimate and CI); it was wrong in v2.8 and v2.9.
Like in the 🇷-package PowerTOST – function CVfromCI(), the CI and group sizes are mandatory and the PE is optional.
With the Cmax-results of this post (90% CI: 0.7475–1.3656, n1 10, n2 9) in Excel 365 on Windows 11:

[image]

CVfromCI() and Phoenix WinNonlin give 39.08% as well.

Dif-tor heh smusma 🖖🏼 Довге життя Україна! [image]
Helmut Schütz
[image]

The quality of responses received is directly proportional to the quality of the question asked. 🚮
Science Quotes

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,424 posts in 4,927 threads, 1,667 registered users;
126 visitors (0 registered, 126 guests [including 9 identified bots]).
Forum time: 03:49 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

Lack of clarity is always a sign of dishonesty.    Celia Green

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5