Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum • Being able to read does not hurt…

Being able to read does not hurt… [Power / Sample Size]

posted by Helmut – Vienna, Austria, 2024-02-04 22:12 (521 d 17:52 ago) – Posting: # 23854
Views: 4,946

HI BEQool,

❝ Sorry for my late response.

No worries.

❝ […] a deficiency letter regarding 2-sequence 3-period full replicate design from an European agency was already received (it was answered successfully) so 3-sequence 3-period partial replicate design is now used sometimes instead.

Fantastic! The European agency (which one?) should read – and accept – what is stated in the EMA’s Q&A-document.

—
Dif-tor heh smusma 🖖🏼 Довге життя Україна!
Helmut Schütz

The quality of responses received is directly proportional to the quality of the question asked. 🚮
Science Quotes

Complete thread:

sampleN.TOST vs. sampleN.scABEL BEQool 2024-01-29 11:53 [Power / Sample Size]
- ABEL is a framework (decision scheme) Helmut 2024-01-29 13:52
  - ABEL is a framework (decision scheme) BEQool 2024-01-30 10:52
    - ABEL vs. ABE Helmut 2024-01-30 13:08
      - ABEL vs. ABE BEQool 2024-02-04 19:24
        
        Being able to read does not hurt…Helmut 2024-02-04 21:12
        
        Being able to read does not hurt… BEQool 2024-02-05 13:20
        
        Being able to read does not hurt… Helmut 2024-02-05 16:01
        
        Vet BE Guideline mittyri 2024-02-05 16:49