homoscedasticity assumption in RSABE method [RSABE / ABEL]

posted by WinnieH – Sweden, 2023-08-18 10:57 (39 d 19:28 ago) – Posting: # 23697
Views: 589

Dear all,

I had a question related to the homoscedasticity assumption in the RSABE method when I read the tutorial of PowerTOST.
PowerTOST-RSABE

If the RSABE method is performed on the highly variable drug with the 4-way crossover design (not the NTI drug), is the homoscedasticity assumption always holden? And I think if a 3-way crossover design is used, there is no way to assume the homoscedasticity since the test drug is administered once and we can not calculate the WSV of the test drug.

A further question is, when do we assume the reference and test product have equal variances, i.e. CVwT ≡ CVwR? And why?

Thank you so much and looking forward to your reply!

Winnie


Edit: Category changed; see also this post #1[Helmut]

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
22,761 posts in 4,775 threads, 1,628 registered users;
14 visitors (0 registered, 14 guests [including 8 identified bots]).
Forum time: 06:25 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

Medical researches can be divided into two sorts:
those who think that meta is better and those
who believe that pooling is fooling.    Stephen Senn

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5