homoscedasticity assumption in RSABE method [RSABE / ABEL]

posted by WinnieH – Sweden, 2023-08-18 10:57 (689 d 12:31 ago) – Posting: # 23697
Views: 3,963

Dear all,

I had a question related to the homoscedasticity assumption in the RSABE method when I read the tutorial of PowerTOST.
PowerTOST-RSABE

If the RSABE method is performed on the highly variable drug with the 4-way crossover design (not the NTI drug), is the homoscedasticity assumption always holden? And I think if a 3-way crossover design is used, there is no way to assume the homoscedasticity since the test drug is administered once and we can not calculate the WSV of the test drug.

A further question is, when do we assume the reference and test product have equal variances, i.e. CVwT ≡ CVwR? And why?

Thank you so much and looking forward to your reply!

Winnie


Edit: Category changed; see also this post #1[Helmut]

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,428 posts in 4,929 threads, 1,687 registered users;
84 visitors (0 registered, 84 guests [including 10 identified bots]).
Forum time: 23:28 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

No matter what side of the argument you are on,
you always find people on your side
that you wish were on the other.    Thomas Berger

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5