total (pooled) variance: examples [Power / Sample Size]

posted by BEQool  – 2023-04-22 20:20 (712 d 17:01 ago) – Posting: # 23537
Views: 4,800

Thank you zizou for the explanation.

So if we have e.g. 3x6x3 Williams crossover design (with 3 treatments), the number in the denominator depends on the approach we use?
If we use "Two at a Time" approach with incomplete block designs, we are only evaluating 2 treatments and therefore we should use number 2 in the denominator; but if we use "All at Once" approach, we are evaluating all 3 treatments and we have to use number 3 in the denominator?

Additional question (just to be sure): we also use number 2 in the denominator (to get inter-subject variance) when we have replicate designs with 2 treatments (regradless of the partial- or full-replicate design)?

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,413 posts in 4,924 threads, 1,669 registered users;
69 visitors (0 registered, 69 guests [including 6 identified bots]).
Forum time: 13:21 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

Nothing shows a lack of mathematical education more
than an overly precise calculation.    Carl Friedrich Gauß

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5