in vivo ≠ in vitro [Power / Sample Size]

posted by Mithu – India, 2022-07-25 15:26 (499 d 18:21 ago) – Posting: # 23175
Views: 1,499

❝ As per regulatory acceptance- it is either acceptable or unacceptable. So is not best to describe it as marginally acceptable.

Just to make it clear that I am trying to say that study is passing at 80.5% lower CI.

❝ The in vitro assessment with recent batches of reference is important and also performing a comparative dissolution with older lot (if still available) can be useful.

❝ Taking only larger size without consideration of in vitro assessment will not solve your problem.

Thank you.


Complete thread:

UA Flag
 Admin contact
22,818 posts in 4,784 threads, 1,634 registered users;
27 visitors (0 registered, 27 guests [including 6 identified bots]).
Forum time: 08:48 CET (Europe/Vienna)

The greatest obstacle to discovery is not ignorance 
it is the illusion of knowledge.    Daniel J. Boorstin

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz