in vivo ≠ in vitro [Power / Sample Size]

posted by Mithu – India, 2022-07-25 15:26 (902 d 11:42 ago) – Posting: # 23175
Views: 3,121

❝ As per regulatory acceptance- it is either acceptable or unacceptable. So is not best to describe it as marginally acceptable.


Just to make it clear that I am trying to say that study is passing at 80.5% lower CI.

❝ The in vitro assessment with recent batches of reference is important and also performing a comparative dissolution with older lot (if still available) can be useful.


❝ Taking only larger size without consideration of in vitro assessment will not solve your problem.


Thank you.

Regards,

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,359 posts in 4,905 threads, 1,672 registered users;
142 visitors (0 registered, 142 guests [including 23 identified bots]).
Forum time: 02:08 CET (Europe/Vienna)

You are rewarding a teacher poorly
if you remain always a pupil.    Friedrich Nietzsche

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5