Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum • Potvin C consequences

Potvin C consequences [Two-Stage / GS Designs]

posted by ElMaestro – Denmark, 2022-06-27 19:13 (938 d 15:36 ago) – Posting: # 23095
Views: 3,746

Hi mittyri,

❝ So T1E (OK, maximum type I error) depends on the CV, isn't it?

❝ Or may be I misunderstood your point and we should not verify T1E during estimation process since we are assuming that the framework was stated as acceptable in the Protocol?

Depends on the CV, but does not depend on the estimated CV. And that's a very significant difference. You never know anything other than your estimates, i.e. the knowledge that is generated as results of your trial do not determine the (maximum) type I error.

—
Pass or fail!
ElMaestro

Complete thread:

T1E after 1st stage in Power2Stage mittyri 2022-06-24 13:43 [Two-Stage / GS Designs]
- T1E after 1st stage in TSDs Helmut 2022-06-24 14:33
  - T1E after 1st stage in TSDs mittyri 2022-06-24 21:12
    - T1E after 1st stage in TSDs Helmut 2022-06-25 14:07
      - Potvin C consequences mittyri 2022-06-25 23:29
        
        Potvin C consequences ElMaestro 2022-06-26 09:11
        
        Potvin C consequences mittyri 2022-06-27 13:45
        
        Potvin C consequences Helmut 2022-06-27 14:49
        
        from Potvin C to Inverse Normal mittyri 2022-06-27 17:13
        
        From Potvin C to Inverse Normal: history (and outlook?) Helmut 2022-06-27 18:54
        
        Potvin C consequencesElMaestro 2022-06-27 17:13
        
        true CV ≠ observed CV mittyri 2022-06-27 17:22
- T1E after 1st stage in Power2Stage ElMaestro 2022-06-24 18:25
  - T1E after 1st stage in Power2Stage mittyri 2022-06-24 21:05
    - T1E after 1st stage in Power2Stage ElMaestro 2022-06-24 22:55