Potvin C consequences [Two-Stage / GS Designs]

posted by mittyri – Russia, 2022-06-27 15:45 (941 d 20:49 ago) – Posting: # 23093
Views: 3,719

Hi ElMaestro,

some more questions

❝ Your type I error is not depending on your estimates and thus not depending on whether you went into stage 2 or not.


OK, what about this:
power.tsd(method = "C", CV = 0.2, n1 = 12, theta0 = 1.25)

p(BE)    = 0.0511

power.tsd(method = "C", CV = 0.3, n1 = 12, theta0 = 1.25)

p(BE)    = 0.043743


So T1E (OK, maximum type I error) depends on the CV, isn't it?
Or may be I misunderstood your point and we should not verify T1E during estimation process since we are assuming that the framework was stated as acceptable in the Protocol?

Kind regards,
Mittyri

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,368 posts in 4,908 threads, 1,674 registered users;
146 visitors (0 registered, 146 guests [including 12 identified bots]).
Forum time: 11:35 CET (Europe/Vienna)

The mediocre teacher tells.
The good teacher explains.
The superior teacher demonstrates.
The great teacher inspires.    William Arthur Ward

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5