Potvin C consequences [Two-Stage / GS Designs]

posted by mittyri – Russia, 2022-06-27 15:45 (654 d 22:25 ago) – Posting: # 23093
Views: 1,944

Hi ElMaestro,

some more questions

❝ Your type I error is not depending on your estimates and thus not depending on whether you went into stage 2 or not.

OK, what about this:
power.tsd(method = "C", CV = 0.2, n1 = 12, theta0 = 1.25)

p(BE)    = 0.0511

power.tsd(method = "C", CV = 0.3, n1 = 12, theta0 = 1.25)

p(BE)    = 0.043743

So T1E (OK, maximum type I error) depends on the CV, isn't it?
Or may be I misunderstood your point and we should not verify T1E during estimation process since we are assuming that the framework was stated as acceptable in the Protocol?

Kind regards,

Complete thread:

UA Flag
 Admin contact
22,980 posts in 4,821 threads, 1,659 registered users;
28 visitors (0 registered, 28 guests [including 9 identified bots]).
Forum time: 14:11 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

Never, never, never use any software!
Never, never, never trust any computer!    Detlew Labes

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz