Potvin C consequences [Two-Stage / GS Designs]

posted by mittyri – Russia, 2022-06-27 13:45 (47 d 01:12 ago) – Posting: # 23093
Views: 668

Hi ElMaestro,

some more questions

» Your type I error is not depending on your estimates and thus not depending on whether you went into stage 2 or not.

OK, what about this:
power.tsd(method = "C", CV = 0.2, n1 = 12, theta0 = 1.25)

p(BE)    = 0.0511

power.tsd(method = "C", CV = 0.3, n1 = 12, theta0 = 1.25)

p(BE)    = 0.043743

So T1E (OK, maximum type I error) depends on the CV, isn't it?
Or may be I misunderstood your point and we should not verify T1E during estimation process since we are assuming that the framework was stated as acceptable in the Protocol?

Kind regards,

Complete thread:

UA Flag
 Admin contact
22,301 posts in 4,667 threads, 1,585 registered users;
online 11 (0 registered, 11 guests [including 5 identified bots]).
Forum time: Saturday 14:57 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

In the field of observation,
chance favors only the mind that is prepared.    Louis Pasteur

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz