Exact (Owen’s Q) [Power / Sample Size]

posted by Helmut Homepage – Vienna, Austria, 2021-10-20 13:36 (471 d 05:07 ago) – Posting: # 22644
Views: 1,953

Hi Imph,

❝ […] which formula to choose to calculate the number of subjects among all the formulas published: Dilleti, Chow, Julious,...


Diletti (1981), which is exact based on Owen’s Q function. Julious is based on an approximation by the noncentral t-distribution and fine as well.

❝ For now I am using chow's formula, I would like to know if there is a plausible reference that supports its use.


Don’t. Chow’s is based on the shifted central t-distribution and the paper contains typos. See also this post.

I suggest to estimate sample sizes with functions of the [image]-package PowerTOST. All three methods are im­ple­ment­ed, where the exact one is the default.
Whilst in many cases sample sizes based on the shifted central t-distribution will be equal to the others, sometimes estimated sample sizes are larger than necessary. The background is shown in an article.

Dif-tor heh smusma 🖖🏼 Довге життя Україна! [image]
Helmut Schütz
[image]

The quality of responses received is directly proportional to the quality of the question asked. 🚮
Science Quotes

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
22,478 posts in 4,708 threads, 1,604 registered users;
19 visitors (0 registered, 19 guests [including 5 identified bots]).
Forum time: 17:43 CET (Europe/Vienna)

Learning of many things
does not teach intelligence.    Heraclitus of Ephesus

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5