Log in
RegisterDieselpunk [RSABE / ABEL]
Dear Helmut!
Thank you for the explanation!
» Here you err. In (a) all is good. In (b) everything is in a flux; the applicant and agency agree only that the acceptable risk may be either 20% or 25%.
I just meant to say that the acceptable risk of either 20% or 25% is anyway less or equal to 25%.
» Oops, one more degree of freedom! In the 2-sequence 4-period replicate design we have df = 3n – 4 for the pooled CVw. Following the EMA’s model for the estimation of CVwR we have one factor (the treatment) less in the model and therefore, df = 3n – 3:
How does this df correspond to the residual df of ANOVA for getting CVWR? I thought that there should be only
40-2=38 degrees of freedom - because from the point of view of the reference drug the full replicate turns to standart 2-way, is it right?
Thank you for the explanation!
» Here you err. In (a) all is good. In (b) everything is in a flux; the applicant and agency agree only that the acceptable risk may be either 20% or 25%.
I just meant to say that the acceptable risk of either 20% or 25% is anyway less or equal to 25%.
» Oops, one more degree of freedom! In the 2-sequence 4-period replicate design we have df = 3n – 4 for the pooled CVw. Following the EMA’s model for the estimation of CVwR we have one factor (the treatment) less in the model and therefore, df = 3n – 3:
How does this df correspond to the residual df of ANOVA for getting CVWR? I thought that there should be only
40-2=38 degrees of freedom - because from the point of view of the reference drug the full replicate turns to standart 2-way, is it right?
—
"Being in minority, even a minority of one, did not make you mad"
"Being in minority, even a minority of one, did not make you mad"
Complete thread:
- Inflated type I error with fixed widened limits? Helmut 2020-11-25 10:50 [RSABE / ABEL]
![[Mix]](https://static.bebac.at/img/mix.png "open in Mix view")
- Inflated type I error with fixed widened limits? d_labes 2020-11-25 15:07
- Inflated type I error with fixed widened limits? Helmut 2020-11-26 00:09
- Inflated type I error with fixed widened limits d_labes 2020-11-26 15:38
- Inflated type I error: Not nice Helmut 2020-11-26 17:14
- Power of the GCC framework and power of PowerTOST d_labes 2020-11-28 11:20
- Sample sizes (ignoring the inflated TIE) Helmut 2020-11-29 11:21
- Power of the GCC framework and power of PowerTOST d_labes 2020-11-28 11:20
- Inflated type I error: Not nice Helmut 2020-11-26 17:14
- Inflated type I error with fixed widened limits d_labes 2020-11-26 15:38
- Inflated type I error with fixed widened limits? Helmut 2020-11-26 00:09
- Inflated type I error with fixed widened limits? wienui 2020-11-29 14:03
- Inflated type I error with fixed widened limits d_labes 2020-11-29 17:51
- Inflated type I error with fixed widened limits Helmut 2020-11-30 00:14
- Inflated type I error with fixed widened limits wienui 2020-11-30 03:30
- Houston, we have a problem! Helmut 2020-11-30 14:42
- Paradox of tolerance Astea 2020-12-01 23:34
- Οὐτοπεία ∨ Εὐτοπεία Helmut 2020-12-02 01:37
- Uchronia Astea 2020-12-02 09:46
- Steampunk Helmut 2020-12-02 11:34
- DieselpunkAstea 2020-12-02 15:28
- Dieselpunk Helmut 2020-12-02 16:18
- Steampunk? OT d_labes 2020-12-02 19:30
- Steampunk? OT Astea 2020-12-02 19:58
- DieselpunkAstea 2020-12-02 15:28
- Steampunk Helmut 2020-12-02 11:34
- Uchronia Astea 2020-12-02 09:46
- Οὐτοπεία ∨ Εὐτοπεία Helmut 2020-12-02 01:37
- Paradox of tolerance Astea 2020-12-01 23:34
- PowerTOST 1.5-2.9000 on GitHub Helmut 2020-12-23 12:18
- Houston, we have a problem! Helmut 2020-11-30 14:42
- Inflated type I error with fixed widened limits wienui 2020-11-30 03:30
- Inflated type I error with fixed widened limits Helmut 2020-11-30 00:14
- Inflated type I error with fixed widened limits d_labes 2020-11-29 17:51
- Inflated type I error with fixed widened limits? d_labes 2020-11-25 15:07
Ing. Helmut Schütz