Dieselpunk [RSABE / ABEL]

posted by Astea – Russia, 2020-12-02 15:28 (138 d 01:29 ago) – Posting: # 22104
Views: 1,318

Dear Helmut!

Thank you for the explanation!

» Here you err. In (a) all is good. In (b) everything is in a flux; the applicant and agency agree only that the acceptable risk may be either 20% or 25%.

I just meant to say that the acceptable risk of either 20% or 25% is anyway less or equal to 25%.

» Oops, one more degree of freedom! In the 2-sequence 4-period replicate design we have df = 3n – 4 for the pooled CVw. Following the EMA’s model for the estimation of CVwR we have one factor (the treatment) less in the model and therefore, df = 3n – 3:

How does this df correspond to the residual df of ANOVA for getting CVWR? I thought that there should be only
40-2=38 degrees of freedom - because from the point of view of the reference drug the full replicate turns to standart 2-way, is it right?

"Being in minority, even a minority of one, did not make you mad"

Complete thread:

Activity
 Admin contact
21,419 posts in 4,475 threads, 1,510 registered users;
online 20 (0 registered, 20 guests [including 4 identified bots]).
Forum time: Monday 17:58 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

There is one certainty in drug development
and statistics that one can depend on:
the data are always late.    Scott Patterson and Byron Jones

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5