Inflated type I error with fixed widened limits [RSABE / ABEL]

posted by d_labes  – Berlin, Germany, 2020-11-29 18:51 (730 d 14:29 ago) – Posting: # 22095
Views: 4,211

Dear Osama,

❝ ... how could this type I error inflation happen?


Imagine, you have a true CVwR of 30%. That means your true BE limits should be 80% ... 125%.
Now you performe a study but obtain an estimate of CVwR of 35%. Given this you use the widened (fixed) BE acceptance range of 75% ... 133.33%. With that acceptance range the BE decision is easier to obtain. This also happens if the true theta0 (GMR) is 125% (or 80%), i.e. bioinequivalence is what we have. Thus more than 5% of BE decision result, that means there is an alpha inflation.

Hope this makes sense to you.
May be Helmut has a better (paedogogical) explanation because he is an exceptionally gifted preacher :cool:.

Regards,

Detlew

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
22,418 posts in 4,693 threads, 1,598 registered users;
10 visitors (0 registered, 10 guests [including 7 identified bots]).
Forum time: 09:21 CET (Europe/Vienna)

Intellect distinguishes between the possible and the impossible;
reason distinguishes between the sensible and the senseless.
Even the possible can be senseless.    Max Born

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5