Inflated type I error with fixed widened limits? [RSABE / ABEL]

posted by d_labes  – Berlin, Germany, 2020-11-25 16:07 (1391 d 11:01 ago) – Posting: # 22085
Views: 7,242

Dear Helmut,

❝ What happens if we pre-specify the widened acceptance range and discover in the study that CVwR ≤30? Assess the study for the conventional AR of 80.00–125.00%? IMHO, that means we have a data-driven decision – which might be false and result in an inflated type I error.


Correct.

❝ I performed simulations acc. to my understanding of the GL:

[image]


❝ CVwR = CVwT = 30%, balanced 4-period 2-sequence full replicate design (TRTR|RTRT), n = 40 (81% power for θ0 = 0.90), 106 studies with θ0 = 1.25: ~20.6% passed…


Confirmed! At least in magnitude.
My result: 20.46% passed.
Quick and dirty captured code from power.scABEL.sds.

Regards,

Detlew

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,225 posts in 4,879 threads, 1,654 registered users;
33 visitors (0 registered, 33 guests [including 5 identified bots]).
Forum time: 04:08 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

The real purpose of the scientific method is to make sure
nature hasn’t misled you into thinking you know something
you actually don’t know.    Robert M. Pirsig

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5