Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum • 0.0024

0.0024 > 0 ■ [RSABE / ABEL]

posted by jag009 – NJ, 2020-10-23 07:06 (125 d 07:59 ago) – Posting: # 22049
Views: 682

» » Should we truncate our results to 0.00?
»
» Because you don’t like it? 0.0024 is positive.

:lol2:

Complete thread:

Is Cmax 95% Upper bound 0.0024 = Zero? Sereng 2020-10-22 20:30 [RSABE / ABEL]
- 0.0024 > 0 ■ Helmut 2020-10-22 23:56
  - 0.0024 > 0 ■jag009 2020-10-23 07:06

Admin contact
21,356 posts in 4,458 threads, 1,493 registered users;
online 9 (1 registered, 8 guests [including 1 identified bots]).
Forum time: Thursday 14:05 CET (Europe/Vienna)

The rise of biometry in this 20^th century,
like that of geometry in the 3^rd century before Christ,
seems to mark out one of the great ages or critical periods
in the advance of the human understanding. R.A. Fisher

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC

Ing. Helmut Schütz