Lost in translation [RSABE / ABEL]

posted by Helmut Homepage – Vienna, Austria, 2020-09-29 10:49 (113 d 00:54 ago) – Posting: # 21950
Views: 411

Hi ElMastro,

» »

… it is recommended that a BE estimate for the new CI of the T/R ratio be submitted to meet the extended bounds.

» That subjunction is correct but not part of the everyday linguistic toolbox of those who do not speak a lot of English. My guess is MHRA or the Irish Medicines Board or it comes from someone who spent a lot of time taking English language classes :-)

Not quite. :-D
Just before the mentioned text it read:

… no confirmation is provided that variability in the reference drug exists and is not caused by emissions; please provide confirmation in the form of an emissions estimate.

We guessed that outliers were meant by “emissions”.

Dif-tor heh smusma 🖖
Helmut Schütz

The quality of responses received is directly proportional to the quality of the question asked. 🚮
Science Quotes

Complete thread:

 Admin contact
21,306 posts in 4,443 threads, 1,489 registered users;
online 14 (2 registered, 12 guests [including 7 identified bots]).
Forum time: Wednesday 10:43 CET (Europe/Vienna)

Power: That which is wielded by the priesthood of
clinical trials, the statisticians, and a stick which they use
to beta their colleagues.    Stephen Senn

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz