Lost in translation [RSABE / ABEL]

posted by Helmut Homepage – Vienna, Austria, 2020-09-29 08:49 (200 d 14:39 ago) – Posting: # 21950
Views: 511

Hi ElMastro,

» »

… it is recommended that a BE estimate for the new CI of the T/R ratio be submitted to meet the extended bounds.

» That subjunction is correct but not part of the everyday linguistic toolbox of those who do not speak a lot of English. My guess is MHRA or the Irish Medicines Board or it comes from someone who spent a lot of time taking English language classes :-)

Not quite. :-D
Just before the mentioned text it read:

… no confirmation is provided that variability in the reference drug exists and is not caused by emissions; please provide confirmation in the form of an emissions estimate.

We guessed that outliers were meant by “emissions”.

Dif-tor heh smusma 🖖
Helmut Schütz

The quality of responses received is directly proportional to the quality of the question asked. 🚮
Science Quotes

Complete thread:

 Admin contact
21,419 posts in 4,475 threads, 1,511 registered users;
online 8 (0 registered, 8 guests [including 3 identified bots]).
Forum time: Saturday 23:28 UTC (Europe/Vienna)

Nothing fails like success because you do not learn anything from it.
The only thing we ever learn from is failure.
Success only confirms our superstitions.    Kenneth E. Boulding

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz