Lost in translation [RSABE / ABEL]

posted by Helmut Homepage – Vienna, Austria, 2020-09-29 10:49 (20 d 18:07 ago) – Posting: # 21950
Views: 236

Hi ElMastro,

» »

… it is recommended that a BE estimate for the new CI of the T/R ratio be submitted to meet the extended bounds.


» That subjunction is correct but not part of the everyday linguistic toolbox of those who do not speak a lot of English. My guess is MHRA or the Irish Medicines Board or it comes from someone who spent a lot of time taking English language classes :-)
Not quite. :-D
Just before the mentioned text it read:

… no confirmation is provided that variability in the reference drug exists and is not caused by emissions; please provide confirmation in the form of an emissions estimate.

We guessed that outliers were meant by “emissions”.
—
Dif-tor heh smusma 🖖
Helmut Schütz
[image]

The quality of responses received is directly proportional to the quality of the question asked. 🚮
Science Quotes

Complete thread:

Activity
 Admin contact
21,162 posts in 4,410 threads, 1,476 registered users;
online 2 (0 registered, 2 guests [including 2 identified bots]).
Forum time: Tuesday 04:56 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

In theory, there is no difference between theory and practice.
But, in practice, there is.    Jan L.A. van de Snepscheut

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5