Ratio calculation of fully replicate study [RSABE / ABEL]

posted by Helmut Homepage – Vienna, Austria, 2020-07-09 12:19 (286 d 00:10 ago) – Posting: # 21662
Views: 1,913

Hi Mithu,

» » Without knowing your SAS code it would be reading tea leaves.
»
» We have used Progesterone program.

… which nowhere gives the subject’s T/R-ratios.

» » $$x/y=\exp (\log_{e}x-\log_{e}y)\;\left\{x,y \in \mathbb{R}^{+} \right\}\; {\color{red}{\neq}}\log_{e}x/\log_{e}y$$
» Still I could not understand.

Calculating the ratio of logs (2. of your OP) is nonsense.
The individual averaged log-differences \(I_{ij}\) (for subject \(i\) in sequence \(j\)) are computed in the FDA’s SAS macro by

ilat=0.5*(lat1t+lat2t-lat1r-lat2r);

Simply back-transform them.

Let’s have a look at the EMA’s full replicate reference data set:

SUBJECT   DATA  FORMULATION  PERIOD  SEQUENCE  logDATA 
   1    2285.96      R          1      BABA    7.734541
   1    1955.82      T          2      BABA    7.578565
   1    1345.94      R          3      BABA    7.204848
   1    2856.24      T          4      BABA    7.957261

Then$$\overline{I_{11}}=0.5\times(7.578565+7.957261-7.734541-7.204848)=0.2982185$$and$$\overline{T_{11}/R_{11}}=\exp \overline{I_{11}}=\exp 0.2982185=1.347456$$Confirmed by Phoenix WinNonlin’s RSABE-template and my pocket calculator. :-D

Which leaves my second question open:

» » Why on earth do you want to use Excel?

Dif-tor heh smusma 🖖
Helmut Schütz
[image]

The quality of responses received is directly proportional to the quality of the question asked. 🚮
Science Quotes

Complete thread:

Activity
 Admin contact
21,419 posts in 4,475 threads, 1,510 registered users;
online 11 (0 registered, 11 guests [including 3 identified bots]).
Forum time: Wednesday 12:30 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

In the Middles Ages the lingua franca of science was Latin.
Nowadays the language of science is bad English.    Anonymous

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5