It is, it is! [Power / Sample Size]

posted by Helmut Homepage – Vienna, Austria, 2020-05-04 14:07 (453 d 13:59 ago) – Posting: # 21397
Views: 6,116

» I believe it must be this assessment report.:
» "the acceptance criteria for Cmax was widened to the acceptance range of 72.83-137.31%",

Almost my dear Dr Watson!
It’s the first study; results on page 7:
“… within-reference intra-subject CV of ln-transformed Cmax > 30% (42.6%), hence Cmax limits were widen[ed] to 73.31–136.42% using scaled-average-bioequivalence.”

identical(42.6 / 100, round(100 * CVwRfromU(136.42 / 100), 1))
[1] TRUE

Dif-tor heh smusma 🖖
Helmut Schütz

The quality of responses received is directly proportional to the quality of the question asked. 🚮
Science Quotes

Complete thread:

 Admin contact
21,596 posts in 4,516 threads, 1,532 registered users;
online 5 (0 registered, 5 guests [including 2 identified bots]).
Forum time: Sunday 04:06 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

Sit down before fact as a little child,
be prepared to give up every conceived notion,
follow humbly wherever and whatever abysses nature leads,
or you will learn nothing.    Thomas Henry Huxley

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz