It is, it is! [Power / Sample Size]

posted by Helmut Homepage – Vienna, Austria, 2020-05-04 16:07 (945 d 01:34 ago) – Posting: # 21397
Views: 7,036

❝ I believe it must be this assessment report.:

❝ "the acceptance criteria for Cmax was widened to the acceptance range of 72.83-137.31%",

Almost my dear Dr Watson!
It’s the first study; results on page 7:
“… within-reference intra-subject CV of ln-transformed Cmax > 30% (42.6%), hence Cmax limits were widen[ed] to 73.31–136.42% using scaled-average-bioequivalence.”

identical(42.6 / 100, round(100 * CVwRfromU(136.42 / 100), 1))
[1] TRUE

Dif-tor heh smusma 🖖🏼 Довге життя Україна! [image]
Helmut Schütz

The quality of responses received is directly proportional to the quality of the question asked. 🚮
Science Quotes

Complete thread:

UA Flag
 Admin contact
22,428 posts in 4,694 threads, 1,598 registered users;
14 visitors (0 registered, 14 guests [including 6 identified bots]).
Forum time: 16:41 CET (Europe/Vienna)

Statistics is the art of never having to say you’re wrong.
Variance is what any two statisticians are at.    C.J. Bradfield

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz