Tricky… [RSABE / ABEL]

posted by Helmut Homepage – Vienna, Austria, 2020-01-30 20:18 (1037 d 04:07 ago) – Posting: # 21112
Views: 18,337

Salam Osama,

❝ ❝ […] with fixed (!) limits of 75.00–133.33% if CVwR <30%.


❝ I think there is a mistake here, you are right according to the fixed limit of 75-133% in the GCC Guidelines in the case of HVD (HVDP) which is absolutely not correct and cause a lot of problems in the evaluation of such drug formulation's types, BUT widen to this range is not in the case of ABE and not at all if CVwR <30% .


Of course, of course! Sorry, it was a stupid typing error. :angry:

Dif-tor heh smusma 🖖🏼 Довге життя Україна! [image]
Helmut Schütz
[image]

The quality of responses received is directly proportional to the quality of the question asked. 🚮
Science Quotes

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
22,426 posts in 4,694 threads, 1,600 registered users;
18 visitors (0 registered, 18 guests [including 4 identified bots]).
Forum time: 00:26 CET (Europe/Vienna)

The rise of biometry in this 20th century,
like that of geometry in the 3rd century before Christ,
seems to mark out one of the great ages or critical periods
in the advance of the human understanding.    R.A. Fisher

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5