Tricky… [RSABE / ABEL]

posted by Helmut Homepage – Vienna, Austria, 2020-01-30 19:18 (625 d 03:11 ago) – Posting: # 21112
Views: 16,376

Salam Osama,

» » […] with fixed (!) limits of 75.00–133.33% if CVwR <30%.
»
» I think there is a mistake here, you are right according to the fixed limit of 75-133% in the GCC Guidelines in the case of HVD (HVDP) which is absolutely not correct and cause a lot of problems in the evaluation of such drug formulation's types, BUT widen to this range is not in the case of ABE and not at all if CVwR <30% .

Of course, of course! Sorry, it was a stupid typing error. :angry:

Dif-tor heh smusma 🖖
Helmut Schütz
[image]

The quality of responses received is directly proportional to the quality of the question asked. 🚮
Science Quotes

Complete thread:

Activity
 Admin contact
21,729 posts in 4,543 threads, 1,543 registered users;
online 13 (0 registered, 13 guests [including 4 identified bots]).
Forum time: Saturday 23:29 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

If you want to converse with me,
define your terms.    Voltaire

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5