Statistical evaluation and BE hypo­theses in full replicate design [RSABE / ABEL]

posted by Elena777 – Belarus, 2020-01-28 08:02 (2336 d 03:00 ago) – Posting: # 21090
Views: 37,245

Dear All,

Is it OK to use the following approach of statistical evaluation in a BE study with full replicate design:
  1. Average bioequivalence is used to determine bioequivalence first.
  2. If bioequivalence is not met for Cmax, scaled-average-bioequivalence can be used if both of the following conditions are met:
    • the point estimate of the geometric mean ratio lies within the 80.00-125.00% range;
    • the R-R within-subject CV is > 30%, and is not the result of outliers?
And another question: is this obligatory to include the detailed description of null and alternative hypotheses for Cmax (ABEL) and AUCt (ABE) together with description of conditions that lead to acceptance/rejection of a hypothesis in a protocol of a full replicate study?

Edit: Category changed; see also this post #1. [Helmut]

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,655 posts in 4,993 threads, 1,570 registered users;
128 visitors (0 registered, 128 guests [including 19 identified bots]).
Forum time: 12:03 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

Science is simply common sense at its best that is,
rigidly accurate in observation, and
merciless to fallacy in logic.    Thomas Henry Huxley

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5