Statistical evaluation and BE hypo­theses in full replicate design [RSABE / ABEL]

posted by Elena777 – Belarus, 2020-01-28 07:02 (244 d 13:44 ago) – Posting: # 21090
Views: 14,851

Dear All,

Is it OK to use the following approach of statistical evaluation in a BE study with full replicate design:
  1. Average bioequivalence is used to determine bioequivalence first.
  2. If bioequivalence is not met for Cmax, scaled-average-bioequivalence can be used if both of the following conditions are met:
    • the point estimate of the geometric mean ratio lies within the 80.00-125.00% range;
    • the R-R within-subject CV is > 30%, and is not the result of outliers?
And another question: is this obligatory to include the detailed description of null and alternative hypotheses for Cmax (ABEL) and AUCt (ABE) together with description of conditions that lead to acceptance/rejection of a hypothesis in a protocol of a full replicate study?


Edit: Category changed; see also this post #1[Helmut]

Complete thread:

Activity
 Admin contact
21,084 posts in 4,398 threads, 1,468 registered users;
online 2 (0 registered, 2 guests [including 2 identified bots]).
Forum time: Monday 21:47 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

A central lesson of science is that to understand complex issues
(or even simple ones), we must try to free our minds of dogma and
to guarantee the freedom to publish, to contradict, and to experiment.
Arguments from authority are unacceptable.    Carl Sagan

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5